Category → politics
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
- Data for vital ‘hockey stick graph’ has gone missing
- There has been no global warming since 1995
- Warming periods have happened before – but NOT due to man-made changes
Data: Professor Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’
The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.
Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.
Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.
The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.
Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.
Professor Jones has been in the spotlight since he stepped down as director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit after the leaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists were manipulating data.
The raw data, collected from hundreds of weather stations around the world and analysed by his unit, has been used for years to bolster efforts by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to press governments to cut carbon dioxide emissions.
More…
Following the leak of the emails, Professor Jones has been accused of ‘scientific fraud’ for allegedly deliberately suppressing information and refusing to share vital data with critics.
Discussing the interview, the BBC’s environmental analyst Roger Harrabin said he had spoken to colleagues of Professor Jones who had told him that his strengths included integrity and doggedness but not record-keeping and office tidying.
Mr Harrabin, who conducted the interview for the BBC’s website, said the professor had been collating tens of thousands of pieces of data from around the world to produce a coherent record of temperature change.
That material has been used to produce the ‘hockey stick graph’ which is relatively flat for centuries before rising steeply in recent decades.
According to Mr Harrabin, colleagues of Professor Jones said ‘his office is piled high with paper, fragments from over the years, tens of thousands of pieces of paper, and they suspect what happened was he took in the raw data to a central database and then let the pieces of paper go because he never realised that 20 years later he would be held to account over them’.
Asked by Mr Harrabin about these issues, Professor Jones admitted the lack of organisation in the system had contributed to his reluctance to share data with critics, which he regretted.
But he denied he had cheated over the data or unfairly influenced the scientific process, and said he still believed recent temperature rises were predominantly man-made.
Asked about whether he lost track of data, Professor Jones said: ‘There is some truth in that. We do have a trail of where the weather stations have come from but it’s probably not as good as it should be.
‘There’s a continual updating of the dataset. Keeping track of everything is difficult. Some countries will do lots of checking on their data then issue improved data, so it can be very difficult. We have improved but we have to improve more.’
He also agreed that there had been two periods which experienced similar warming, from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, but said these could be explained by natural phenomena whereas more recent warming could not.
He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend.
And he said that the debate over whether the world could have been even warmer than now during the medieval period, when there is evidence of high temperatures in northern countries, was far from settled.
Sceptics believe there is strong evidence that the world was warmer between about 800 and 1300 AD than now because of evidence of high temperatures in northern countries.
But climate change advocates have dismissed this as false or only applying to the northern part of the world.
Professor Jones departed from this consensus when he said: ‘There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia.
‘For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.
‘Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th Century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm than today, then the current warmth would be unprecedented.’
Sceptics said this was the first time a senior scientist working with the IPCC had admitted to the possibility that the Medieval Warming Period could have been global, and therefore the world could have been hotter then than now.
Professor Jones criticised those who complained he had not shared his data with them, saying they could always collate their own from publicly available material in the US. And he said the climate had not cooled ‘until recently – and then barely at all. The trend is a warming trend’.
Mr Harrabin told Radio 4’s Today programme that, despite the controversies, there still appeared to be no fundamental flaws in the majority scientific view that climate change was largely man-made.
But Dr Benny Pieser, director of the sceptical Global Warming Policy Foundation, said Professor Jones’s ‘excuses’ for his failure to share data were hollow as he had shared it with colleagues and ‘mates’.
He said that until all the data was released, sceptics could not test it to see if it supported the conclusions claimed by climate change advocates.
He added that the professor’s concessions over medieval warming were ‘significant’ because they were his first public admission that the science was not settled.
False Science of Climate Change
I don’t know about you but I am just about fed up with this whole man is destroying the earth mantra from the left wing whackos. Lately we have been making jokes and poking fun at them by showing all these snow storms and asking them where the global warming was. These people have swallowed the pill and are so caught up in this fraud that they are actually arguing with us on this point. They are saying that we are just missing the big picture and short sided to think that any cold snap would be relevant. To them global warming is something that is measured over decades and cannot be compared with one winter. To them it is easy to say that all these record snow falls are another example of global warming.
These people refer to people like myself as deniers. They see us as those who ignore the factual evidence and say that global warming is not true. I say show us the proof. They blindly follow this global warming argument with zero evidence. Some guy produces a hockey stick chart that is never proven and they just soak it up. They think that this one leaked email scandal in England has convinced us that it is bad science. They are wrong again. We never believed in man made global warming, global cooling, or climate change even for one minute. The leaked email scandal was just one more piece of evidence to validate something that we already believed. Let us clarify something right here. There is no man made climate change at all. Zero! This movement is created by those that have a socialist agenda. You have heard the saying “follow the money”. This applies in this case as well.
Please do not listen to me. Pay attention to those making this argument and look at the common denominator. The ones that are advocating global warming are the same ones that are advocating the governmental takeover of industries, healthcare, and the economy as a whole. The people that were protesting in the streets against the establishment in the 1960’s are those that are in control. These people were crazy then and they continue to be crazy. These people are so caught up in this save the world mantra that they cannot even see common sense. They see capitalism as evil and unfair. They fail to see that power has the potential to corrupt anyone whether they work for a corporation or the government. They do not see that government has just as much corruption as those in corporations except that the government has more power over them. Their blinded hatred toward capitalism has kept them from seeing that their beloved government is even worse. Look at history and you will see that every government that has tried socialism has either failed or failing. They use global warming as a tool to scare those skeptics of socialism to believe that corporations are destroying the earth. They want to convince people to give up their rights to the government so that evil corporations can be punished.
Global warming is 100% fabrications and has no evidence whatsoever. They prey on the conspiracy theorists that hang out at Roswell, New Mexico and Area 51. I know you have seen them. They are the UFO believers and Elvis is still alive groups. They are Big Foot and Locknesse Monster types. They are in your neighborhood and mine. They like to point out crazies that shoot abortion doctors and say this is how Christians are. They use these crazies to label the whole group. They are bullies that try to label you as a hate monger if you dare disagree with them at all. In the 1960’s they were bullies and they still are. They are now media executives and school administrators. They are idiots pure and simple.
Weather forecasting on a global scale has not even been possible until two decades ago so there is no way they could get long term forecasts and historic temperatures to measure against even if they wanted to. Since climate change is not a legitimate science but rather a fabricated left wing tool, it cannot be taken seriously anyway. They try to bully people by saying “The debate is over” in an attempt to silence the debate. One thing that the email scandal did validate with me is that these groups that are in charge actively suppress any scientist that would dare question this false science. I can think of an example of this. A couple years ago there was a guy that was actually advocating taking away the credentials of any meteorologist that would not preach global warming. If you follow the link http://www.alabamawx.com/?p=650, you can read about it. These global warming people are actively fabricating a lie and threatening to take away the credentials of anyone who dare disagree with them. This is more evidence of their disdain for freedom. Let us not forget that their beloved socialism was the title given to the former Soviet Union. You may remember the biggest bullies of them all called the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics (USSR).
Just as I posted a few months ago, these people are opposed to the true Democratic free market society and this is the motivation behind their lies. Also as I pointed out in that post, that they forget that many of us are old enough to remember the 1970’s when the same crowd was talking about global cooling. They manipulate natural weather patterns to scare people that are too young to remember that a severe weather event is not the first time it has happened. I know many of you have watched the national news in the United States after any natural disaster. They find people in the streets that have no clue and ask them what they think about this event that has never happened before. They talk about how the frequency of heavy rains, heavy snows, hurricanes, or even earth quakes are a result of man made climate change. They have discovered something about human nature that works for them. That human nature is to be lazy and not question those in authority. The media places themselves as authority figures and repeat the same lie over and over again. If they say it enough times, people are lazy and just accept it as truth. The real truth is that there is no such thing as man made climate change whether it be cooling, or warming.
The world is being duped and the media follows right along. This is because those crazies you saw at Woodstock of the 1960’s are now in control. They are just as crazy now as they were then. They are just as much a bully now as they were then. Wake up people and stop listening to anyone at face value. Do some research from both sides of any argument and understand that people are self driven. It is human nature to do things for one’s self and those that are in power are no different. They know that in any society you are going to have self starters, workers, and lazy people. It is easier to fall into the lazy category. They drive people there by inundating us with negative stories on the news every single day to a point that people become numb to it. Eventually people become so overwhelmed that they do not feel they have time to research things. They just sit there and listen to what the media tells them not questioning it for a moment. Stop being lazy and get off your lazy butts and learn something. Learning is not just listening to someone else. Learning is listening to an argument with a critical mind. Learning is questioning what you hear and finding out the truth. Learning is finding out from many sources and not just one. You cannot just listen to broadcast media and be educated. You have to listen to them and listen to those disagreeing. You have to listen to many sides to the argument and come to your own conclusions. Do not just listen to me, ABC, CBS, or NBC. I am biased and I will tell you so. These guys are biased and will not tell you so. That is why you have to question both of us. Learn the truth and not be ignorant. If you believe this global warming scare then you are not truly learning because I can assure you that there is zero true evidence to back this theory up. Thanks for listening to my rant this morning.
Happy Valentines Day!
Love For Limbaugh
On this December 30th, 2009 Rush Limbaugh was taken to a hospital in Honolulu for chest pains. I discovered this on Twitter as I discover many things. Many times I hear people that are politically left of center refer to Conservatives as being bigots and filled with hate. This coming from the people that are concerned for the welfare of the ‘little guy’. They profess themselves to be the solution to all the hatred coming from those that are on the right. Strangely enough, on this night as Rush Limbaugh suffers in the hospital these same people are professing their hatred and hopes of bad things to happen to Rush. Their compassion is akin to that of Adolph Hitler. Below are a few of the comments that I found on Twitter that are representative of their love and compassion. Just a note of caution, some of these posts are inappropriate.
Twitter Douchebag Alert: RT @amazingatheist: Ruch Limbaugh hospitalized with chest pains. Let’s all hope he dies.
RT @owillis: wait, is rush limbaugh dead? Not dead enough
Rush Limbaugh on Death Bed? Taken to Hospital in Hawaii: Would we really miss this fat, sloppy racist, pill popping…
Rush Limbaugh is a prodigious waste of food and I will be happy when he dies. There, I said it. #tcot #p2
Dufus @JenJen_623 What the f**k do you expect? Rush Limbaugh is evil
There are so many others that are even worse but you get the picture. This does not surprise me because I have dealt with their compassion for a long time. I think you can disagree with someone without wishing death upon them. I do believe you can have crazies on both sides but the sheer number of these posts are truly sad. Rush Limbaugh as of the time of this posting is listed as the second most commented words used on Twitter at the moment. Literally thousands if not millions of these are being posted online.
I think that despite your political slant, this type of behavior is completely inappropriate. I do remember seeing similar posts when Ted Kennedy died. I will be honest, as a Conservative, I strongly disagreed with his policies. I do not agree with wishing death upon him or anyone else. I would hope that people will come to their senses and not be so hostile to the point of wishing death upon people. For those of you that can actually disagree with someone without hating them, I would like to thank you. It is hard for me to imagine the mindset that you must hate someone that disagrees with you. If I were to take that attitude I would hate half of my own family. People come from different backgrounds and see the world differently. One person may see something as being unjust and feel strongly that something is wrong. This person may perceive this action as being unfair when the so called perpetrator had no malice whatsoever.
For this reason I believe that it is okay to have a difference of opinion. We can agree to disagree and still maintain a relationship. Can you imagine having such strong feelings about something that you would be willing to throw away a relationship with your own family? If the offense is something that I just cannot get past, I would at least try to be civil and avoid those topics to the best of my ability. I have met some people that just cannot let things go and desire to argue. In those cases all you can do is agree to disagree and refuse to discuss these issues.
The idea that people would disagree with someone so strongly that they would wish death on someone really saddens me. If I ever get this way, I would hope that my loved ones would bring this to my attention so I can wake up.
Am I Upset About Healthcare?
No I am not. I expected nothing less from these left wing, integrity challenged people in Washington. Since it is clear that I do not like them, you may be asking yourself why I am not upset. The reason is that if the people had not voted for the most liberal Congress and President in history, there would not be an issue. The American people made their bed and now they can sleep in it. The writing is on the wall about how this is going to end up. Anyone who has been awake over the last decade can see it. The Republicans that also do not represent their constituency will win the 2010 election in a land slide vote. The American people will hear a barrage of news stories about how the Republicans are out to throw grandma out on the street while enriching their wealthy buddies for the next two years. The American people in their ignorance will swallow the whole pill and re-elect Obama for a second term.
It is sad how people have become so loyal to their party that we never get anyone in office with integrity. People will vote for their party just to keep the other side out of office and before you know it, both parties are exactly the same. That is what is happening and has been happening for some time. The media will portray the Republicans in a way that is completely false. If they portrayed them accurately, then they would show you that the Republicans and Democrats are exactly alike.
So the answer is no I am not upset but rather I expect everything I get out of Washington. The Republicans, I mean Democrats nominated the left wing John McCain, assuring that Obama would win the presidency. Until both parties close the door on the opposing party being allowed to vote in their primary elections, then this sort of thing will continue. You have the liberal people on the coasts voting in the Republican primary picking the candidate that no conservative would ever vote for. They not only need to close the primaries to only the party being voted for but they need to make it where once you vote in a primary, you cannot change your party affiliation on the general election once you have voted in the primary. In other words, if you are a Democrat trying to subvert the election by voting in the Republican party primary then you must vote Republican in the general election.
That is how John McCain was elected in the first place. No conservative in his or her right mind would ever vote for John McCain. When you add to this that the American people are ignorant and do not have a clue what their candidate stands for, you pretty much expect to have corruption. The very people that cry voter fraud when they lose an election are the ones that cry foul when an attempt is made to enforce that a photo identification be required to vote. I would suggest it go even further. I think that if you cannot pass a basic Constitution test you should not be allowed to vote. If the people do not have enough initiative to learn the basics of what our country was founded upon then I think they should forfeit their opportunity to vote. The ignorant Americans will listen to the national media and allow felons to vote because they have so much integrity.
Don’t ask my opinion on healthcare because I have no respect for either of the parties. Ultimately I place the blame on a lazy population that will not educate themselves and will take opinion of a non objective media. The way I see it, you can have healthcare because you voted for them.
Climate Gate
I am sure that by now you have heard about the fraud that is global warming being exposed last week. Apparently someone has reportedly hacked into the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in England. The CRU is the central focal point that is quoted from those advocating the theory of global warming. This alleged computer hack resulted in the release of thousands of private emails between scientists out to the public. Among these emails were the admission that the earth’s temperature is not climbing and “this is a travesty”. They also admit doing a trick to add the “actual” temperatures to show a rise in temperatures when there really is not. Also they discuss suppressing those scientists of opposing views from the peer review process. In other words, the so called “consensus” of global warming is not a consensus at all. The truth is that any scientist that disagrees with the global warming theory is not only ignored but denied publication in peer reviewed journals.
Of course the CRU is denying these reports though they admit the hacked emails are legitimate. They portray this whole thing as a misunderstanding and that the opposition is selectively posting emails out of context to deny global warming. They will not admit what others can see clearly and no one really expects them to because those with their eyes open know that global warming is really a political tool rather than actual science. It is easy to see a trend among those that preach the global warming scare and that is that most of them are anti-capitalism. The alternative to capitalism is socialism. Those that are advocates of the global warming theory are usually quick to point out that it is the industrialized nations, particularly the United States that are responsible for this fabricated crisis.
It is not very popular to claim socialism as a preferred political system in the open so they are using environmentalism to get the same results. If the Socialists cannot get people to simply turn over their rights, money and power over to the government, they will create a crisis to scare the public. This created crisis is “man-made global warming”. If they can get politicians to buy into this fraud then we will see more restrictive legislation coming from Washington all in the name of saving the environment. The context of this legislation taking your rights away will be to save you from yourself. This socialist way of doing things is very popular among the American Democrats in Washington. When I speak of socialism, I define it by meaning the government owns the money, infrastructure, and the financial systems rather than the private sector. The Democrats have invested a lot of energy painting the private sector as being greedy and unfair to the poor.
The Democrats have done a very good job of portraying private business owners as dishonest, cheating tax evaders. The agenda in all of this is to place themselves as saviors and come to the rescue of this perceived enemy called capitalism. Their solution to the problems is to take away the freedoms of the capitalists and turn it over to the government in an attempt to “over-see” in a regulatory way. They intend on making the government the steward over all of the financial and environmental resources. Unfortunately they forget that the same dishonesty that created problems in the private sector also occupy the halls in Washington. The only difference is that in the government there is no accountability.
I know what many are saying with this statement. Many are saying that our three branches of government are the best source of checks and balances available. That is not always the case anymore with the hostile political climate where the two parties are always at each other’s throats trying to bring the other side down. They appoint activist judges sympathetic to their points of view. The three branches of government often become accomplices of each other’s indiscretions. The problem with this is that once the government takes a freedom, it is lost forever. Once the government takes money, it is lost forever. For all the arguments that can be made against capitalism, there are no other examples of long term successes that any other type of government has had that have resulted in the overall affluence that capitalism has.
These people believe deep down that government has the responsibility to help the people despite the fact that the only way the government can help is to take away from someone else. They believe that government can and must be the steward of the resources in the country. By creating this theory of global warming they can scare enough people to buy into it and willingly give up freedoms all in the name of security. Unfortunately they do not see how human nature seeks power and greed and once given this power, they never give it back. There is no empire that has lasted forever and ours will not either. By strengthening the government and weakening its citizens, the country that we love so much is inevitable to fail. The one thing that has kept this nation strong is the freedoms and ability of its citizens to succeed on their own works. Once the government takes that away, there is no incentive for creativity.
Again, the purpose of the global warming scare is to convince more people and legislators to enact laws that will give the government more power and control in the name of environmentalism. It is a tool that is used to convert a capitalist nation into a socialist one. As you may remember, on October 12th, 2009 I posted a story about how in the 1970’s and 1980’s the same people were preaching about a coming ice age and how our very existence depended upon immediate action to turn around “man-made global cooling”.
With the release of this information from the CRU, you would think the media and the government would be all over this story to expose how the nations of the world have been victims of a hoax. This hoax has resulted in legislative decisions that have cost the world billions of dollars. They have been teaching our young children this lie for years. It is no surprise that our beloved media and government keeps their head in the sand and does their best to play it down. Those that have taken notice at all have taken the point of view that the hacker is the one that needs to be punished. There is still no public evidence that it was a hacker at all. For all we know, it was an insider that saw the fraud that was going on and publicized it as a “whistle blower”. For all we know, this inside job was falsely reported as a hacker because they did not want to lose their job as a whistle blower.
Usually the media promotes whistle blowers and advocates their protection to prevent corruption in companies. Unfortunately this time the media is advocating punishing the whistle blower and we are left to ask why. The only reasonable conclusion that I can come up with is that the media agrees with this fraud and wants to down play it. The American media has long been an advocate of socialism and the Democrats and this is no secret. If this fraudulent crisis had been an opposing view of their own, they would be demanding legal action and Congressional hearings. Instead we get a non questioned repeat of statements from the CRU and that this email scandal will not be a hindrance to global warming legislation. The blatant bias and cover up mentality of the American media is absolutely amazing. I have long known they have no integrity and expected this type of behavior. Now the media has become so biased that they do not even attempt a pretense of objectivity. Even I am amazed at how blatant they are.
Anyone that would even dare to speak a different perspective is denounced as a political tool of the Republican party. Never in my lifetime have I seen political leaders and major media outlets target another network for speaking opposing views like they have against Fox News. It is as though the political climate has become so hostile that we cannot even have a good natured debate on issues. This is why I think that both major political parties should be disbanded. The people of this nation have become so galvanized against the other side that neither can have an honest discussion. The Supreme Court, and the scientific community are no exceptions to this hostility.
Watch the news carefully and see how despite these corrupt scientist’s own words being released how they go into cover up mode. Watch how they ignore clear evidence because it is counter to their own agenda. They still sound the alarm of a non existent crisis despite clear evidence to the contrary. For the record, I have no opinion on this 
.
Dishonesty of our Leaders
If you look through history you will see how in economics 101 it is common to lower taxes during a bad economy. The intent is to free up discretionary cash for individuals and businesses to spend that results in spurring the economy. Government’s have the power to help or hurt the economy. As our unemployment tops the 10% mark yesterday, we are being inundated by stories of how our President and Congress are trying to shove a health care program down our throats. This program is going to cost tax payers more money in the end to the tune of $1.2 Trillion. Over the last year and a half we have already had to endure $700 million dollar bailouts by President Bush and that was followed up by more than 1 $Trillion in bailouts and bogus stimulus packages by Obama.
All of this is added on top of the already astronomical national debt we already had. Our annual budget deficits are growing exponentially and what does our DEMOCRAT leaders want to do? They do not want to lower taxes to ease the burden on our economy. They do not want to help individuals get on their feet with tax relief. What they want to do is burden the tax payers with the most expensive social program this country has ever known right as we pass 10% unemployment. Our partisan leaders have the 60 votes in the Senate that makes their actions filibuster proof and they want to shove more debt upon us while we are already hurting. This from the party that sells itself as the party that wants to help the ‘little guy’? The party of ‘socking it to the rich guy’ wants to implement programs that not only will not help the economy but will make it worse. My pointing out lack of integrity of DEMOCRATS is not an endorsement of the REPUBLICAN party either. Our so called Republicans have been spending us out of control just as much as the Democrats.
We need to take our government back and throw them out of office. If you have a Congress person in your district that has voted yes on any of these bailouts, or stimulus programs, they must go no matter what their party affiliation is. Barack Obama and John McCain both are as liberal as they come and we had no one to vote for on this last election. Instead of voting for one party just to keep the other party out of office, why not change your strategy and throw these unfaithful politicians out of office. As soon as these guys come to the understanding that they will not get our votes simply for not being a member of the ‘other’ party, they may start to realize some accountability. I am not advocating the ‘throw the bums out’ mentality across the board but rather throw the ones out that are voting for all this government take over.
Racist Swine Flu
Disclaimer: This is supposed to be a humorous attempt to show how the media can make anything into racial event.
Americans, we have been faced by the greatest form of racism the world has ever known with the onset of the H1N1 virus. This virus was created by white males in their attempt to get the West Nile virus off the news. As most of you have probably noticed that six months ago the West Nile virus was the worst disease in history if you were to watch the news media. Now the West Nile has taken a back seat to the new swine flu, or H1N1. Experts are beginning to see a racial component to the proliferation of the swine flu. The swine flu is deliberately attacking blacks and Mexicans and must be stopped. Just read this story from the objective MSNBC. The fair and balanced reporting of the Los Angeles Times also echoes the horror imposed on our brothers and sisters of color. The Boston Globe is also among the many that are shining a light on this E-VIL virus attacking minorities. Just search the Internet for “Swine Flu and Minorities” and you will see that I am not making this up. I have even heard reports that a swine flu virus molecule was seen under a microscope wearing a white hood dancing around a camp fire.
The swine flu is single handedly responsible for the growth of right wing malitias around the United States. Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are out trying to advocate the mass spreading of this racist disease. Talk radio is the avenue that has been used to spread this disease as scientists have discovered how flu molecules can attach themselves to radio signals infecting entire black families. If this swine flu is not stopped soon, the only people that will be left will be anglo-saxon males. The last statement was not a mistake as this virus also attacks women as well. The West Nile virus was a predominately white disease and for this reason, executives in smoke filled rooms have conspired to bury this story while engaging in the proliferation of the H1N1. As if this was not enough, it has recently been discovered that union workers are more than twice as likely to get the swine flu than non union workers.
Americans, I plead with you to write your Congress person to address this right wing disease aimed at hurting black union workers. The seriousness of this crisis cannot be overstated. African American children are being left orphaned and homeless as a result of this racist, and dare I say E-VIL disease. Do your part to stand up and take a stand to right this wrong. Your neighbor of color is depending on your action. If you have any compassion at all, you must take a stand and do your part to stamp out this racist that plagues this nation. The very lives and careers of your neighbors are at stake.
Global Warming Hoax
Yes I am a denier because I have common sense.
I just thought I would take this opportunity to tell how the temperatures have been well below normal almost the entire year. After doing some research, I have found that temperatures have been cooling world wide. This is pretty much the trend that has the media and left leaning politicians alarmed because they have so much invested in scaring the public on the whole fabricated global warming. I do believe the temperatures change around the earth but I also believe that humans are completely irrelevant to these changes. These changes are natural and happen without any help from humans. The left leaning politicians and media have spent billions of dollars over the last twenty years misrepresenting the effects of carbon dioxide CO2 on the environment. The truth is that CO2 is needed for life to continue on the earth. The more CO2, the more life. The so called “green house gases’” are a necessity and are natural in the earth.
For those of us that have been around for a while, we can vividly remember being in school in the 1970’s and 1980’s being told that we were approaching another ice age. Back then it was global cooling that was the culprit and humans were responsible for it as well. Get this, it was the concerns of CO2 then that was being blamed for global cooling. In fact, you can read this article from Newsweek from 1975 that paints just as scary picture for the earth cooling as these left wing militant environmentalists are doing today about the myth that is global warming. Or you could read an article from BBC October 9, 2009 asking why the temperature has been falling since 1998. Environmentalism has become a political movement that is intended to take freedoms away from average businesses and citizens all in the name of protecting the environment. I think most people are environmentally conscious to a point that they think it is wrong to pollute willfully. The difference is that environmentalists go way beyond using basic responsibility. They intend to indoctrinate people and leave out the part that just twenty years ago they were afraid of global cooling.
I find it interesting that yesterday we had the coldest high temperature on record for Oklahoma City on that date. The normal high for yesterday was 76 with a normal low of 53. Our high temperature was only 49 degrees yesterday. Anyone that pays attention and has a computer can just as easily go on the Internet and see that we are not an isolated case. It seems that people have put all their faith in those with a PhD. at the end of their title. This is tragic because these people may have been to school longer than most but they are only learning what someone else has taught them. It is easy to make these outrageous claims for things to happen in another generation because no one can prove them wrong until it happens.
I guess the one thing that really amazed me more than anything is that people still actually watch ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and FOX News without questioning their reports. I am not saying they are bad people but I will say that the very nature of journalism is to incite people with wild claims. They are a ratings based business every bit as much as professional wrestling. The more wild and exotic the claims are, the more viewers that come. No one seems to notice that Jerry Springer was so popular for so long and his show specialized in outrageous behavior. It is the human nature to follow the ambulance as it comes up the road. The media lives by that nature and will report anything with that in mind. They will report it as though “_________” is reporting, or “__________” group says this or that. I am not saying that everything you hear on the news is wrong but I will say that if it sounds outrageous, it should be questioned. Critical thinking is something that is not heard of in this day and age when it comes to the media. One thing that seems to be the common denominator when it comes to global warming is that those that are scaring everyone are on the left end of the political spectrum. Do not take my word for it, rather pay attention to those that are calling for something to be done on global warming. Take note of who it is that is saying it. Most of us have heard the phrase “follow the money” at some point. The same can be said when it comes to this climate change debate. The vast majority of those that claim that humans are destroying the environment are those on the liberal side.
Another thing to note is the liberal side trying to change their name from liberal to progressive. Since the term liberal still has a stigma attached to it, they are calling themselves progressives. These two titles are the same thing. When you hear someone on television referred to as a progressive, then you can bet they are a liberal. I really hate to make everything a political argument but the facts are the facts. I wish it were not true but if you pay attention to this global warming argument, you will find that the person making the claims are almost ALWAYS a liberal. That is the reality and as much as I hate to point that out, it is the truth. All I ask is that people watch the news with a suspicious eye. Question outrageous claims and not let them get away with this. People and businesses are being affected by this Jerry Springer attitude of the media and politicians. I think journalism as an occupation needs to be brought back to some sort of non championship wrestling mentality.